The degree to which they are attacked has more to do with the shear volume of potential victims than anything else.Ī hacker, when challenged. You make the assumption that it is safer because there are less known attacks against it. All of a sudden my sweet Mac rig is a tasty morsel to them because I am playing in their sand box.Ĭlick to expand.UNIX is no less vulnerable to attacks that any other OS.
That baby is under constant barrage because. I haven't had the need for such third party protection on my Macs because they have never been on the radar of the hackers for all that time. If the shoe were on the other foot and Windows had the user base of Macs and MacOS had the user base of PCs. Trust me, if the hackers truly cared about bringing down the OS, they would. They cannot protect you from things that haven't already been identified. EVEN WITH anti-virus software or any other third-party application protecting it, all they can do is protect you from known attacks. highest user base = highest number of potential targets.ĭon't fool yourself into thinking your OS is secure. Go figure as to why Windows tops the charts as the most vulnerable OS. Some are more vulnerable due to the shear number of attacks being waged on them. It's the fact that there is more reason to attack the Windows OS that results in it being more vulnerable. Click to expand.The false statement here is that MacOS is just secure.
0 kommentar(er)
